Which one has more pros than cons?
argument a: there is a need for students to understand and be able to construct geometric figures using a compass and straightedge.

argument b: there is no need for students to use a compass and straightedge, and all geometric constructions should be done using a drawing program.

I would choose Argument A, here is an answer for it too: People nowadays ask when they will use knowledge found in a mathematics classroom as our technology today quickly changes and progresses. But to completely appreciate a topic in math, you must learn its history.

Best go with argument A because in order to effectively use a drawing program students need to first understand the properties of geometric figures and develop mathematical thinking to be able to construct these figures. There is no better way to do that with kids than by using manipulatives (hands-on learning tools).

The appropriate response is B. The contend that there is no requirement for understudies to utilize a compass and straightedge, and every single geometric development ought to be finished utilizing a drawing program is the wrong explanation since the power to control drawing programs is just open in a few spots. Not everyone would have the capacity to learn geometry in light of the fact that not everyone can have power. Everyone on the planet would not have a similar opportunity to learn geometry if just drawing programs had the information that we have today.