Astudy that involves interviews of adults is eligible for expedited review. the researcher wants to add an adolescent population (aged 12 to 17) to the study and has designed a parental permission and assent process. no additional changes are planned. which of the following statements about review of the revised protocol is accurate? a. the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents are capable of understanding the same consent forms used for the adult population. b. the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents have been declared to be emancipated minors. c. the new research would need full review by a convened irb because children are a protected population. d. unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.

Option (D)

Explanation:

From the given case or scenario, we can state that since there are no additional changes are made then the following statement in accordance with the review of revised protocol is correct, i.e. Unless or until nature of these questions would tend to keep the scale of the risk to mere more than the minimal for the adolescents, then the research would be more likely to still qualify for the expedited review.

true

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the this statement is completely true. This is because in order for the study to qualify for expedited review it need not be greater than minimal risk only must fit into one of the expedited review categories. Which this study that collects data from interviews does fall into these categories.

Unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.

Explanation:

The review of a research proposal can be exempt for review, have an expedited review or a full review.

Expedited reviews are carried out at a meeting organized by the president of the association conducting the investigation. It is done whenever a minimum change is made to a previous research proposal and that this new proposal involves minors and vulnerable populations. It is also analyzed if it is standardized for the new group to be evaluated and does not contain content without ethics.

I hope this information can help you.

d. unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.

Explanation:

According to the Institutional Review Board guideline, if a study poses not more than minimal risk for it participants and meets other requirement such as not including protected classes or vulnerable populations, and not using intentional deception, the study will still qualify for expedited review. However, when vulnerable individuals are involved, a full review is required.

i think it is 2

I had the same question and thats what i put

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is: "Unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review."

According to the rules published by the IRB regarding the applicability of the Expedited Review, this extends to all individuals, regardless of their age. This condition will not change unless the research involves activities or circumstances that increase the level of risk to human subjects to a level higher than minimal.